Re-imagining the University Ensemble Experience
My article Re-imagining the Music Degree Recital explored ways that solo performances can serve as vehicles for developing critical career and problem solving skills. But there are many other avenues with the potential to emphasize these aptitudes within music school curriculum. Consider, for example, the ensemble experience.
In Fall 2009, I began directing The Accidental Collective, Duquesne University’s premier contemporary music ensemble. In addition to producing high quality concerts of compositions written in the last 10 years, I wanted the group to teach participants valuable skills about becoming a successful professional. Please note: this is just one of many entrepreneurial methods for approaching an ensemble. I do not recommend this format for every group or experience level. But it illustrates some of the potential available.
AUDITIONING
Success as a musician requires more than playing well. I wanted to stress that reality through even the audition process. In addition to a traditional audition component, candidates were interviewed. This practice stressed that who you are is as important as how you play. Additionally, they filled out a form describing background, skills, and interests: secondary instruments, improvisation, composing/arranging, singing, public speaking, movement, additional competencies, reliability, willingness to take chances, etc. We also checked references.
INSTRUMENTATION
Identifying the right members was also more important than the instruments they played. Therefore, auditions were open to performers from all areas. If a bassoonist, electric guitarist, singer, or kazoo player had more to offer than a violinist, that’s who would be selected. The group wound up involving 7 players:
- Flute(s)
- Saxophone(s)
- Jazz trumpet
- Bass trombone
- Violin
- Cello
- Percussion
Musically, the good news about this unique instrumentation was the incredible color palette available. The bad news was that no music had ever been written for this combination. Also, because I didn’t know the ensemble make-up until the school year began, it was impossible to plan ahead and choose repertoire. But, as with any challenge, this dilemma provided an opportunity (described below).
AGENDA
The syllabus, and thus structure of the course, is one of the riskiest things I’ve done as a teacher. After declaring that “The purpose of this class is to provide participants with valuable experiences and skills that will help them better succeed as professionals,” the various syllabus sections—mission, goals, objectives, literature, grading—were left blank. In other words, students were responsible for determining what they would learn/experience (a proposition that was both frightening and empowering for them). We began with several meetings to discuss desirable outcomes, and have regularly revisited this topic throughout the year.
DEMOCRACY
The group was run like a true democracy, rather than the traditional conductor-driven model. For each major decision, all members had a vote. I was just one voice out of eight. Partially because of this process, the players took incredible ownership in the ensemble.
SCHEDULE
In the past, the group had performed 2 concerts per semester, comparable to many other university ensembles. While this tradition allows participants to learn and perform a good deal of (extremely difficult) music each year, it leaves little time to investigate other issues.
The students decided to present just one unique concert per semester, though each program would be presented multiple times in different communities. This decision permitted me something I’ve never experienced before in my teaching career: time! Time to explore, focus on process, take some chances, try new things, memorize music, plan, reflect. And learn!
LITERATURE
Because approximately zero pieces for this instrumentation existed, we were forced to think creatively about which music to perform.
We began with a focus on non-jazz improvisation (few of the players had prior improv experience). Talk about the ultimate ear training development! The musicians grew so much from this new experience, they decided to do a completely improvised concert. Not only did their understanding of musical structure, texture, gesture, harmony, melody, and rhythm expand exponentially, but they developed a deeper understanding of their role within a chamber ensemble, and grew together as a group.
Though none of the participants had prior arranging experience, they decided to orchestrate piano pieces for the group. We then used several rehearsals as a laboratory: “try this up two octaves,” “let’s double with trombone,” “how about another articulation,” “listen to how a pedal tone/dovetailing propels the passage forward,” etc. This kind of real time experimentation is undoubtedly the best forum for mastering instrumentation and orchestration (much better than MIDI!). Ultimately none of this music was performed publically, but the process taught great lessons.
We obtained music in the following ways:
- Call for scores. The group crafted and submitted a call-for-scores to several organizations, such as American Composer’s Forum. We ultimately received over 100 submissions, and chose several to perform that featured a subset of our ensemble.
- Commissioned orchestrations. We asked friends and colleagues to orchestrate existing works for the entire group.
- Transcription/re-composition. As an ensemble, we transcribed and modified several pieces piece for our instrumentation. While I coached them, students determined many of the ultimate artistic decisions.
RESPONSIBILITY
Each ensemble member was assigned specific non-performance responsibilities, reflecting the reality of most professional chamber groups. Sample duties included:
- Strategizing
- Scheduling
- Budgeting
- Writing up the call for scores
- Documenting tech notes
- Contracting/directing tech crew
- Building the set
- Diagramming stage setup
- Incorporating multi-media elements
- Typing up the program
- Working with PR
- Marketing
LESSONS LEARNED
We concluded the year with a debriefing session, reflecting on lessons learned. Here are just a few of the many takeaways made by participants:
- Being a chamber musician is hard but fulfilling work, requiring much more than great playing.
- We took more ownership in the group’s successes because we were directly responsible for them!
- Not everything worked out right away. Some things bombed. And each failure taught valuable lessons. If nothing fails, you’re playing it too safe.
- It is essential to work with the right people and create a healthy environment. We had a great experience, even when challenges were presented, because we respected and liked our partners both musically and personally.
The following quote by one group member illustrates the kinds of deep bonds that can develop when the right collaborators work together to create a collective artistic vision:
“If I had to be stranded on a deserted island with just one other person, it could be any of the members of this ensemble.”
- Developing something innovative and remarkable requires vision, time, planning, persistence, and the willingness to take chances.
- Responsibilities need to be clearly defined, and early on, or valuable time is wasted.
- In a democratic environment, even one person can stall progress. So make sure the battles you fight are important ones.
- You don’t need a standard ensemble to play great music. In fact, the challenge of programming for a unique instrumentation opens up a world of possibility.
- Our catalog of lessons is much longer and deeper. For a complete list, try forming your own group with this kind of model. There is no substitute for experiential learning.
This article provides but a glimpse of what is possible through an entrepreneurial ensemble experience. Such an approach is feasible with both chamber and large groups. Re-imagining the ensemble experience is just one more way music schools can embrace a culture of entrepreneurship at their core.
9 Responses to “Re-imagining the University Ensemble Experience”
Leave a Reply
DAVID CUTLER balances a varied career as a jazz and classical composer, pianist, educator, arranger, conductor, collaborator, concert producer, author, consultant, speaker and advocate. Dr. Cutler teaches at Duquesne University, where he also serves as Coordinator of Music Entrepreneurship Studies.
|
|
What a wonderful article! My friend, Robby, is currently in this ensemble and I love the experience you provide through this group. The philosophical basis is also very interesting and I agree with it. The deeper you get in to music the more you realize that playing your instrument well is just a portion of being a successful musician. Thanks for this.
What a cool idea! It’s too bad this kind of thing isn’t a required element of performance programs.
Your thoughtful and completely rational post raises some great issues the academy has to address if it’s to stay relevant and useful, in my opinion. This sounds like a great first step towards more eclectic (and dare I say more real-world usefulness?) offerings for students. Makes me think of the other issues the large ensemble raises. For example, if a talented punk rocker, or hammer dulcimer player or… (insert non-traditional-ensemble instrument here) wants a degree in music ed, or performance, they’re not able to even get in many schools because their instrument doesn’t fit into this old model. They can’t get an audition and there is no faculty to help them further their study on their chosen instrument. The other issue your post brings up is the difficulty of institutional change.
Anyway, I really enjoyed the post, David, and it’s certainly raised important issues in how we teach and learn and create. Thanks!
Glad to see this post! I teach recorder at Peabody Conservatory, and I have been teaching and coaching ensembles in ways that are very much in line with your approach for several years. For example, I tell my baroque music chamber ensemble each year that their work together is the most direct on-the-job training that they will get while at school, since chamber music is what most of us do most of the time as professionals. The group that I formed last year has now spend two years programming their own concerts, scheduling rehearsals, problem-solving in rehearsals, promoting themselves to presenters and playing concerts. I am there to help and advise, but they are the ones that do it.
I also run my Early Woodwind Literature class as a kind of programming boot camp, with assignments centered around creating viable concert programs out of the repertoire we explore. This leads to learning about program order, timing, themes, use of personnel, pitching the programs to presenters and program notes.
If we don’t teach our pre-professional music students to be professionals as well as musicians, we are not serving them well. I teach recorder, for heaven’s sake. There’s no such thing as first chair recorder in the National Symphony, so this stuff is absolutely essential.
Great article! You know what would really help a lot of us? If you had an email blog feed, so that I could get these words of wisdom directly in my inbox. The newsletter is great, but I love the convenience of not having to remember to look for your new posts! Just my two cents.
I was delighted to hear about your experiences with the Collective. At the U of Iowa, our Latitude Ensemble is similar. Most of the members are grads of my Improvisation for Classical Musicians class; there are also several faculty in the group. It’s very difficult to start a new group of any kind since everyone is already booked to the eyeballs. So we improvise all our concerts; as long as at least four of the fourteen can make several rehearsals and the concert, we’re in business. Audiences love our approach – very different from classical concerts where everyone knows what to expect. Here, no one knows what is going to happen, and that makes it exciting. I think we have much to learn from you. Although the improvised format has worked well (it makes dealing with random orchestration vastly easier), I think we need to follow your example and encourage and commission compositions for the group, or to be more precise, for smaller groups within the group – we often select from the larger group for each piece or movement (and often let an audience member do the deciding). When we do use the whole group, we often use Soundpainting (see http://www.soundpainting.com), a gestural system of structuring improvisation in groups. We also might use assorted SP gestures in other non-SP pieces when useful.
Anyway, it’s a great article, and I wish more schools would follow your example. I think what would be really interesting would be to have a mixed concert – straight ahead classical pieces leavened with chamber improv pieces. It would be both fun and edifying for both audience and performer.
[...] 8, 2010 by horninsights This post is a trope on the felicitous phrases “Re-Imagining the University Ensemble Experience” and “Re-Imagining the Music Degree Recital” by David Cutler, author of the book [...]
It’s great to hear about some other ensemble models that universities are trying out. Would love to know about more.
I visited lots of website but I believe this one contains something extra in it in it